By Chris Wood (MultiFamilyExecutive.com Article) — Kyle Bach never figured on a bat cave being one of the things he’d have to deal with as an apartment and student housing developer. In 2018, the CEO and president of The Annex Group had closed financing on a new development in Bloomington, Ind., when groundbreaking was halted in deference to the Indiana bat, an endangered species extremely sensitive to hibernation disruptions. Once the bats woke up, torrential rains turned the site into a mud pit, and Bach was forced to again wait on construction, wondering all the while if he’d even be able to lock down reliable, affordable crews to work the project. “I’m from Indiana and didn’t even know we had a thing called the Indiana bat until it extended our construction time frame by seven months,” Bach says.
During the delay, construction costs marched on their inflationary way, and The Annex Group was lucky to get that project (and several other affordable housing and student communities) under development this year. “It’s going to end up being our biggest year ever, but we have critical concerns about construction costs. Tariffs are driving up material prices, and our No. 1 challenge in every single one of our markets is finding qualified labor.”
Construction costs in the U.S. rose 5.7% in 2018, according to the Rider Levett Bucknall North American Quarterly Construction Cost Report, with Chicago (7.6%), Portland, Ore. (7.1%), San Francisco (6.7%), Phoenix (6.7%), and Washington, D.C. (6.5%) experiencing the worst inflation. Escalations in the Canada–U.S. softwood lumber dispute and the U.S.–China trade war have material prices soaring, but developers fear the bigger, more looming challenge lies in finding skilled labor to get units out of the dirt.
“Material costs are one thing, but the labor scarcity is what’s making it a challenge to get more deals done right now,” says Richard Broder, founder and CEO of Broder & Sachse Real Estate, which has developed two multifamily mixed-use luxury properties in Midtown Detroit over the past two years. “There’s simply an absence of laborers, including labor that fled during the recession and labor that is retiring, and it could be an issue that we deal with for a generation. In the short term, what can be done to attract labor to our business when everyone in the country is already working? And what on top of that is going to lure them back to Detroit? Probably nothing.”
In Atlanta, construction costs have contributed to keeping the regional Mill Creek Residential office from pursuing more starts. While the developer has long relied on internal construction teams to help alleviate the labor issue, macro cost inflation still makes it risky to attempt to overcome other market challenges at the same time. “It’s a big reason why we have an in-house construction group, because it gives us more control over the process,” says Mill Creek managing director of development Harvey Wadsworth. “But a lot of the land opportunities we see have unrealistic expectations on price or zoning or permitting problems and so they sit, and that’s because of development costs. If things were going a little bit better you might be able to overcome some of those other challenges.”
Like many other metros, Atlanta also continues to experiment with inclusionary housing policies that often mandate a portion of units be built to certain affordability levels.
In a period of cost-constricted development, however, cities are often unable to increase housing affordability without decreasing market-rate supply, which in turn ironically drives up overall rents.
“It’s creating significant challenges and has effectively shut down multifamily development in the city because of those policies,” says Wadsworth. “But I believe inclusionary housing is here to stay because I don’t know that the policymakers or even the general public understand our business well enough to see how it can break down a deal. A lot of times they just want cheaper housing and want us to pay for it.”
Avi Sinai is the founder of HM Capital, a hard money lending firm in Los Angeles, where he estimates construction costs have increased by up to 50% in some significantly challenged submarkets.
On top of that, most of the firm’s multifamily clients are wary of housing policies being informed or influenced by ballot activists. Sinai points to California Proposition 10, which would have implemented statewide rent control on newly constructed apartments, and a Santa Monica initiative to mandate any new development over two stories be subject to citywide public referendum as examples of such activism gone awry.
“It’s crazy, right? But we’re beginning to see these intersections between local politics and investments where tenant rights groups are authoring and lobbying the public on these far-reaching bills,” Sinai says. “For the past two years, we have seen clients sell off property because they are afraid of regulations and what is coming in the next cycle. In Santa Monica, the measure was defeated, but the core argument motivating it was simply that there was too much traffic, and that sentiment is nationwide and could fuel activism anywhere.”
Bach says it’s not just market-rate multifamily getting hit by inclusionary zoning. The Annex Group is also seeing university towns including affordability provisions against student housing developments.
As an affordable housing developer, The Annex Group has been nimble enough to navigate its student deals with affordability requirements to completion, but Bach wonders if purpose-built affordable housing per se isn’t the better route to go. “Oftentimes, I don’t know that the municipalities even understand the mechanics of a deal,” he says. “The economics of inclusionary rents simply don’t make sense with land costs going up, utilities going up, and the overall margins becoming very thin, and I do think affordable communities versus inclusionary zoning is a better solution to serve the need.”
Regardless of whether inclusionary zoning factors into its upcoming student housing developments (The Annex Group has five that are likely to close in 2019), Bach still struggles mostly with the labor issue and has even moved to import his own crews to some of the firm’s secondary, emerging markets. “We tend to focus on tier 2 or tier 3 schools, and oftentimes there are a few larger subcontractors that will travel with us regardless of location,” Bach says. “Although that may not immediately solve for costs, at the end of the day we have intimate experience with those subs in what we build and want to provide, and that has mitigated the risk of labor scarcity.”
It could be that the smaller markets with smaller labor pools are hardest hit from a worker availability and cost standpoint. At Rockville, Md.–based CAPREIT, the purchasing team has been able to negotiate material price increases from 10% to 15% down to a 5% average for the year by purchasing in bulk, but finding contractors outside of the major D.C. and Baltimore submarkets can still be a deal breaker.
“The labor issue is just a whole other ballgame, with cost increases up to 25%,” says Chris Pilato, CAPREIT vice president of construction and development. “The smaller projects are where you really get hit. We have two deals in St. Mary’s, Md., right now and there just are not a lot of contractors down there, so logistically we have to pay a premium to get workers in from Baltimore 90 miles away, or increase the number of units to make the deal worthwhile. With a larger labor pool we could mitigate those issues.”
Believers of supply and demand economics see a distant silver lining to the skilled labor shortage in construction: As the price of labor increases, it should logically attract more bodies back to the sector.
“It’s still a huge problem without a short-term solution, but long term as wages go up substantially it will hopefully draw new labor classes to the industry, and we’re already beginning to see some evidence to that in the percentage of female skilled laborers that make up our crews,” says Wadsworth. “It has been a noticeable difference.”
Alternatively, major portions of multi-family construction could be removed from the traditional development process, with modular panelization plants building housing components for jobsite assembly and 3D printers and robots providing specialized manufacturing and production services alongside semiskilled, general laborers.
“In our space, success is all about speed to market and cost containment of projects,” Bach says. “To accomplish that we will increasingly need to rethink the construction process to include modular technologies and 3D printing. For every five skilled tradesmen who retire, there’s currently only one to replace them, and meanwhile we’re watching two machines fabricate a 2,700-square-foot home in less than 24 hours. The product we build is often four-story, wood-framed construction. In that world, off-site factory construction suddenly becomes very compelling and could be here sooner than we think.”
And at the very least, it wouldn’t disturb the slumbering Indiana bats.